Never Thought I Would See Something Like This on CNN.com

Written by Frugal Libertarian on September 30, 2008 in: Couldn't Have Said it Better Myself, In the News |

This is a nice expanation of what should be allowed to happen in the markets. 

Bankruptcy, Not Bailout

It seems that people think that if a company goes bankrupt all their assest just disappear into some blackhole.  This is not the case.  Instead those assests are reallocated to those who can use them more wisely.

Mr. Miron also points out that if it will really be profitable to buy this bad mortgage packages like the Bush adminastration is trying to tell us, then private companies will buy them and taxpayers will not need to take the risk.

This article in the Finacial Post  also explains why the  bailout will not work and will only make things worse.

I Almost Shed a Tear

Written by Frugal Libertarian on September 29, 2008 in: This Week's Ridiculous Liberal Letter to the Editor |

This weeks ridiculus liberal letter winner is quite the tear jerker, so have your tissue ready.  (Actually it is a As I See It column, which is basically a longer Letter to the Editor)

Repossessed Car

All the possibilities Mr. Miller gives for why the car was repossessed are possible, but there could be many other explanations.

The family that lost the car could be sitting in a home that they knew they could not afford.  They could have a big screen TV, a Wii, and laptops for everyone in the family all finance with an adjustable rate Home Equity Line of Credit.  They could have a house full of new furniture that they planned on paying off before the one year interest free time period was up, but instead found new things they just had to buy.    They could have two other cars with large payments because they keep trading in their cars every two years.

Sure they could have lost their jobs, but instead of tighting their belts and making sacrifices maybe they continued to live like there was no tomorrow.  Maybe they only looked for jobs that they thought were worthy of them instead of taking anything that would put food on the table.  Maybe they didn’t look at all.

Mr. Miller’s brand of bleeding heart liberalism always seems to ignore the idea of personal responsibility.  When someone experiences hardship it is always someone else’s fault and we as society must come to the rescue.  It is the same brand of liberalism that makes every aspect of life into a “right”.  A right to healthcare, a right to education, and a right to anything else someone may need.  What Mr. Miller and many others like him don’t understand is that in a society where you have a “right” to these things, you are less likely to be able to acquire them.  In a society that you have a right not to be forced to provide these things for others, it is more likely that these essentials will be available for the masses.  I would much rather have the right to obtain life’s essentials than a right to be provided with them, because being provided with everything comes with strings and those strings usually bind our freedoms.

If Mr. Miller really wants to help the shrinking middle class he would be writing about how taxes and inflation are hurting those families.  Instead, he supports a candidate that makes many promises that can only be fulfilled with more taxes and inflation.  If Mr. Miller really wanted to help struggling families he would be writing about how our culture has completely abondoned the idea of delayed gratification and instead has embraced the idea of buy now, pay later.  If he really wanted to help the family that had their car repossessed he could find them and give it back to them.  But, no he wants someone else to fix it, he wants more government, less freedom.

The rules have not changed Mr. Miller.  The game might be a little more difficult, but the rules are the same.  Work hard, make sacrifices, live frugally, save money, and prosper.

Good News and Bad News

Written by Frugal Libertarian on in: In the News |

The good news is the House has rejected the bailout.  The bad news is the Fed continues to inflate anyway.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080929/fed_credit_crisis.html?.v=2

Heartburn

Written by Frugal Libertarian on in: Money Saving Tips |

If the bailout is giving you heartburn try baking soda as an antacid.  For a $2.99 box of Arm and Hammer Baking Soda you get 3,215 doses of antacid.  That should get you through this Fed induced depression.

Gold Becoming too Popular?

Written by Frugal Libertarian on September 26, 2008 in: In the News |

Is gold so popular that the U.S. Mint can’t keep up or do they not want to trade their gold for fiat dollars that may soon be worth a fraction of what they were? 

 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D93EJ2U00&show_article=1

Since the government is trying to repeat the actions that prolonged the Great Depression maybe they will start seizing our gold too.

It is Like Taking Benedryl to Treat an Allergic Reaction to Benedryl

Written by Frugal Libertarian on in: Couldn't Have Said it Better Myself |

This is the email Ron Paul has sent out to his supporters. He correctly points out that we are trying to fix the problem by doing more of what caused the problem.

“Dear Friends:

The financial meltdown the economists of the Austrian School predicted has arrived.

We are in this crisis because of an excess of artificially created credit at the hands of the Federal Reserve System. The solution being proposed? More artificial credit by the Federal Reserve. No liquidation of bad debt and malinvestment is to be allowed. By doing more of the same, we will only continue and intensify the distortions in our economy – all the capital misallocation, all the malinvestment – and prevent the market’s attempt to re-establish rational pricing of houses and other assets.

Last night the president addressed the nation about the financial crisis. There is no point in going through his remarks line by line, since I’d only be repeating what I’ve been saying over and over – not just for the past several days, but for years and even decades.

Still, at least a few observations are necessary.

The president assures us that his administration “is working with Congress to address the root cause behind much of the instability in our markets.” Care to take a guess at whether the Federal Reserve and its money creation spree were even mentioned?

We are told that “low interest rates” led to excessive borrowing, but we are not told how these low interest rates came about. They were a deliberate policy of the Federal Reserve. As always, artificially low interest rates distort the market. Entrepreneurs engage in malinvestments – investments that do not make sense in light of current resource availability, that occur in more temporally remote stages of the capital structure than the pattern of consumer demand can support, and that would not have been made at all if the interest rate had been permitted to tell the truth instead of being toyed with by the Fed.

Not a word about any of that, of course, because Americans might then discover how the great wise men in Washington caused this great debacle. Better to keep scapegoating the mortgage industry or “wildcat capitalism” (as if we actually have a pure free market!).

Speaking about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the president said: “Because these companies were chartered by Congress, many believed they were guaranteed by the federal government. This allowed them to borrow enormous sums of money, fuel the market for questionable investments, and put our financial system at risk.”

Doesn’t that prove the foolishness of chartering Fannie and Freddie in the first place? Doesn’t that suggest that maybe, just maybe, government may have contributed to this mess? And of course, by bailing out Fannie and Freddie, hasn’t the federal government shown that the “many” who “believed they were guaranteed by the federal government” were in fact correct?

Then come the scare tactics. If we don’t give dictatorial powers to the Treasury Secretary “the stock market would drop even more, which would reduce the value of your retirement account. The value of your home could plummet.” Left unsaid, naturally, is that with the bailout and all the money and credit that must be produced out of thin air to fund it, the value of your retirement account will drop anyway, because the value of the dollar will suffer a precipitous decline. As for home prices, they are obviously much too high, and supply and demand cannot equilibrate if government insists on propping them up.

It’s the same destructive strategy that government tried during the Great Depression: prop up prices at all costs. The Depression went on for over a decade. On the other hand, when liquidation was allowed to occur in the equally devastating downturn of 1921, the economy recovered within less than a year.

The president also tells us that Senators McCain and Obama will join him at the White House today in order to figure out how to get the bipartisan bailout passed. The two senators would do their country much more good if they stayed on the campaign trail debating who the bigger celebrity is, or whatever it is that occupies their attention these days.

F.A. Hayek won the Nobel Prize for showing how central banks’ manipulation of interest rates creates the boom-bust cycle with which we are sadly familiar. In 1932, in the depths of the Great Depression, he described the foolish policies being pursued in his day – and which are being proposed, just as destructively, in our own:

Instead of furthering the inevitable liquidation of the maladjustments brought about by the boom during the last three years, all conceivable means have been used to prevent that readjustment from taking place; and one of these means, which has been repeatedly tried though without success, from the earliest to the most recent stages of depression, has been this deliberate policy of credit expansion.

To combat the depression by a forced credit expansion is to attempt to cure the evil by the very means which brought it about; because we are suffering from a misdirection of production, we want to create further misdirection – a procedure that can only lead to a much more severe crisis as soon as the credit expansion comes to an end… It is probably to this experiment, together with the attempts to prevent liquidation once the crisis had come, that we owe the exceptional severity and duration of the depression.

The only thing we learn from history, I am afraid, is that we do not learn from history.

The very people who have spent the past several years assuring us that the economy is fundamentally sound, and who themselves foolishly cheered the extension of all these novel kinds of mortgages, are the ones who now claim to be the experts who will restore prosperity! Just how spectacularly wrong, how utterly without a clue, does someone have to be before his expert status is called into question?

Oh, and did you notice that the bailout is now being called a “rescue plan”? I guess “bailout” wasn’t sitting too well with the American people.

The very people who with somber faces tell us of their deep concern for the spread of democracy around the world are the ones most insistent on forcing a bill through Congress that the American people overwhelmingly oppose. The very fact that some of you seem to think you’re supposed to have a voice in all this actually seems to annoy them.

I continue to urge you to contact your representatives and give them a piece of your mind. I myself am doing everything I can to promote the correct point of view on the crisis. Be sure also to educate yourselves on these subjects – the Campaign for Liberty blog is an excellent place to start. Read the posts, ask questions in the comment section, and learn.

H.G. Wells once said that civilization was in a race between education and catastrophe. Let us learn the truth and spread it as far and wide as our circumstances allow. For the truth is the greatest weapon we have.

In liberty,”

Ron Paul

Worst than Socialism?

Written by Frugal Libertarian on September 25, 2008 in: In the News |

Jeff Snyder thinks the proposed bailout may even be worst than Socialism.  I think he may have a point.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/snyder/snyder15.html

Money Making Opportunity for Nursing Mothers

Written by Frugal Libertarian on September 24, 2008 in: Worst Money Spent this Week |

PETA is ridiculus.  This is hilarious though.

http://www.wnbc.com/news/17539627/detail.html

A Better Plan

Written by Frugal Libertarian on in: In the News |

This idea is far superior to a huge bailout.  Better yet get rid of Sarbanes-Oxley altogether since the U.S. Constitution does not give Congress the authority to regulate companies’ accounting practices.

http://www.forbes.com/opinions/2008/09/22/treasury-accounting-plan-oped-cx_bw_bs_0923wesburystein.html

Missouri’s Race for Governor

Written by Frugal Libertarian on in: In the News |

Jay Nixon is the running for Missouri governor.  Of course I don’t have much love for his opponent, Republican Kenny Hulshof, but everyone needs to be aware of Nixon’s gross abuse of power as Missouri Attorney General.  I guess he wanted to appear tough on terrorism so he created some “paper terrorist” to prosecute.  Read about it here.

http://www.cashill.com/regional/jay_nixon.htm

You won’t find this story in that liberal rag the KC Star.

A recent Nixon TV ad said he supports a balanced budget for Missouri.  Well that is good because you have no choice.  Missouri has a balanced budget requirement in their Constitution.

http://www.moga.mo.gov/const/A04024.HTM

Well I guess maybe I should be excited that a canidate actually wants to follow their constitution.

Powered by WordPress | Webdesign by TheBuckmaker.com